INDIANAPOLIS, ETC. R.R. CO. v. HORST


93 U.S. 291 (____)

INDIANAPOLIS AND ST. LOUIS RAILROAD COMPANY v. HORST.

Supreme Court of United States.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Argued by Mr. W.A. Brown and Mr. John T. Dye for the plaintiff in error.

Mr. A.G. Porter for the defendant in error.


MR. JUSTICE SWAYNE delivered the opinion of the court.

The defendant in error was injured while travelling on the road of the plaintiff in error, and brought this suit to recover damages. To set in their proper light the propositions of law relied upon by the plaintiff in error for the reversal of the judgment, a brief statement of the facts of the case is necessary.

The plaintiff was a farmer, residing in Pennsylvania...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases