1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 51 U.S.
  5. 51 U.S. 311 (____)
 

HENDERSON ET AL. v. STATE OF TENNESSEE

51 U.S. 311 (____)

10 How. 311

THOMAS HENDERSON AND THOMAS CALLOWAY, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. THE STATE OF TENNESSEE.

Supreme Court of United States.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The cause was argued by Mr. Bibb and Mr. Eaton, with whom was Mr. Green, for the plaintiffs in error, and Mr. Andrew Erving and Mr. Stanton, for the defendants in error.

Mr. Ewing, contra.

Mr. Chief Justice TANEY delivered the opinion of the court.

The first question to be decided in this case is, whether the court has jurisdiction.

The case is brought before us by a writ of error to the Supreme Court of the State of Tennessee. It appears by the record, that the decision turned upon the title of Andrew Miller to the lands in question, under the treaties of 1817 and 1819, with the Cherokee nation. Andrew...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases