It has been argued for the plaintiff, that the acts of the legislature of Pennsylvania, when properly interpreted, do not embrace the bonds or coupons in question; but it is not important to examine the subject; for, it is not to be denied, as the courts of the State have expounded these laws, that they authorize the deduction, and, if no other objection existed
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
RAILROAD COMPANY v. JACKSON
74 U.S. 262 (____)
7 Wall. 262
RAILROAD COMPANY v. JACKSON.
Supreme Court of United States.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Messrs. W.A. Fisher and G.H. Williams, contra.
Supreme Court of United States.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.