DOUGLASS AND MANDEVILLE v. M`ALLISTER


7 U.S. 298 (____)

3 Cranch 298

DOUGLASS & MANDEVILLE v. M`ALLISTER.

Supreme Court of United States.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

This question was submitted, without argument, by Swann, for the plaintiffs in error, and E.J. Lee, for the defendant.


MARSHALL, Ch. J.

The error complained of is, that the circuit court did not give an opinion on a point proposed. The court was certainly bound to give an opinion, if required, upon any point relevant to the issue.

It appears, from the facts stated, that the cause of action did not accrue until the 19th of November, when the negotiation for a compromise was broken off. A tender of the flour at any time, after the 14th...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases