HANNUM v. SPEAR


2 U.S. 291 (____)

2 Dall. 291

HANNUM, et al. Plaintiffs in Error versus SPEAR, Defendant, in Error.

Supreme Court of United States.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The counsel for the plaintiff in Error (Lewis, E. Tilghman, M`Kean and Rofs).

The counsel for the defendant in Error (Ingersoll and Wilcocks).


THE COURT delivered their opinions, seriatim, to the following effect.

CHEW, President.

The question turns upon the power to fell lands, contained in the Will of Elizabeth Ring. If the power had been to sell for the payment of debts, I should incline to the opinion, that the purchaser held the lands discharged from the debts. It has been the constant usage (and usage is the best interpreter of the laws) to give, by...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases