1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 65 U.S.
  5. 65 U.S. 224 (____)
 

CHANDLER v. VON ROEDER ET AL.

65 U.S. 224 (____)

24 How. 224

JAMES A. CHANDLER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. OTTO VON ROEDER, HAMILTON LEDBETTER, AND CHARLES VON ROSENBURG.

Supreme Court of United States.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

It was argued by Mr. Paschal for the plaintiff in error, and by Mr. Hale and Mr. Robinson for the defendants.

Mr. Justice CAMPBELL delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiff claimed in the District Court a league of land in the county of Fayette, originally granted by the Mexican Government to William H. Jack, and which was in the possession of the defendants. His title consists of a record of a suit in one of the district courts of Texas, in favor of Bremond and Van Alstyne against a number of persons associated under the name of the German Emigration Company, founded...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases