1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 60 U.S.
  5. 60 U.S. 211 (____)
 

HARTSHORN ET AL. v. DAY.

60 U.S. 211 (____)

19 How. 211

ISAAC HARTSHORN AND DANIEL HAYWARD, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR v. HORACE H. DAY.

Supreme Court of United States.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

It was argued by Mr. O'Connor, upon a brief filed by himself and Mr. Brady for the plaintiffs in error, and by Mr. Richardson and Mr. Jenckes for the defendant, upon which side, also, a printed argument was filed by Mr. Gillet.

Mr. Justice NELSON delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a writ of error to the judgment of the Circuit Court of the United States, holden by the district judge in and for the district of Rhode Island.

The action was brought by Day against the defendants below, for an alleged infringement of a patent for the preparation and application of India-rubber to cloths, granted to E.M. Chaffee, August 31, 1836, and renewed...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases