1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 105 U.S.
  5. 105 U.S. 160 (____)
 

BANTZ v. FRANTZ.

105 U.S. 160 (____)

BANTZ v. FRANTZ.

Supreme Court of United States.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Arthur Stem for the appellant.

Mr. William A. Maury and Mr. Lewis N. Dembitz for the appellee.

MR. JUSTICE WOODS, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court.

We are clearly of opinion that the reissued patent is void.

It is evident on a cursory reading of the specification and claim of the original patent that it was meant to cover a combination of the several contrivances therein described, and not to cover the several elements of the combination as distinct inventions. No claim is made for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases