1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 65 U.S.
  5. 65 U.S. 175 (____)
 

MEEHAN ET AL. v. FORSYTH

65 U.S. 175 (____)

24 How. 175

THOMAS MEEHAN AND CHARLES BALLANCE, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. ROBERT FORSYTH.

Supreme Court of United States.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

It was argued by Mr. Ballance for the plaintiffs in error, and by Mr. Williams for the defendant.

Mr. Justice CAMPBELL delivered the opinion of the court

This is an action of ejectment commenced in the Circuit Court for the recovery of a part of two lots of land in the city of Peoria by the defendant in error against the plaintiffs in error.

The title of the plaintiff in the Circuit Court (Forsyth) originated in the claim of Antoinc Lapance, an inhabitant within the purview of the act of Congress, approved March...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases