1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 35 U.S.
  5. 35 U.S. 201 (____)
 

RINGO ET AL. v. BINNS ET AL.

35 U.S. 201 (____)

10 Pet. 201

*BURTIS RINGO, JAMES ELLIOTT, JOHN COLLINS, JOHN ELLIOTT; JAMES LAWRENCE, THOMAS WATSON, ATHEY ROWE, GEORGE MUSE, SEN., AND GEORGE MUSE, JUN., APPELLANTS, v. CHARLES BINNS AND ELIJAH HIXON, STEPHEN HIXON, NOAH HIXON, JOHN HIXON, WILLIAM HIXON, AND TIMOTHY HIXON, HEIRS OF TIMOTHY HIXON, DECEASED.

Supreme Court of United States.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

*273] *The case was argued by Mr. French and Mr. Underwood, for the appellants; and by Mr. Semmes and Mr. Coxe, for the appellees.

Mr. Justice WAYNE delivered the opinion of the court.

After stating the case, he proceeded:

It is contended that the decree is erroneous and should be reversed. In behalf of Ringo it is urged that he has a prior legal title, unaccompanied by any equity of the complainants. The legal title must rest upon entry, survey, registry and patent; and it will be admitted that a legal title cannot be in any one until a patent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases