1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 26 U.S.
  5. 26 U.S. 193 (____)
 

COMEGYS ET AL. v. VASSE

26 U.S. 193 (____)

1 Pet. 193

CORNELIUS COMEGYS AND ANDREW PETTIT, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, vs. AMBROSE VASSE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.

Supreme Court of United States.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The case was argued by Mr. J.R. Ingersoll, and Mr. D.B. Ogden, for the plaintiffs in error; and by Mr. Lee, and Mr. C.J. Ingersoll, for the defendant.

Mr. Justice STORY delivered the opinion of the Court. —

This was an action of assumpsit, brought by Ambrose Vasse, in the Circuit Court, for the district of Pennsylvania, to recover from the plaintiffs in error, (who were defendants in the Court below,) a certain sum of money, received by them under the following circumstances: —

Previous to the year 1802, Vasse was an underwriter on various vessels and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases