FITZGERALD v. CALDWELL

Not in source.

2 U.S. 215 (1793)

2 Dall. 215

FITZGERALD, versus CALDWELL.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

April 1, 1793.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On the 9th of April 1793, the defendant's Counsel (Serjeant, Ingersoll, and M`Kean) moved to stay further proceedings, upon payment of the principal sum sound due by the referees, and costs. The motion was opposed by Tilghman, Wilcocks, and Lewis for the plaintiff; who contended, that under the circumstances of this case, interest ought to be allowed.


M`KEAN, Chief Justice.

It is clearly the general rule that a garnishee is not liable for interest, while he is restrained from the payment of his debt, by the legal operation of a foreign attachment. But it is said by the plaintiff's Counsel, and I assent to the proposition, that if there is any fraud, or collusion; say, if there is any unreasonable delay occasioned by the conduct of the garnishee himself, such cases will form...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases