1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 76 U.S.
  5. 76 U.S. 103 (____)
 

PELHAM v. ROSE

76 U.S. 103 (____)

9 Wall. 103

PELHAM v. ROSE.

Supreme Court of United States.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Coburn, for the plaintiff in error, a brief of Messrs. Morrison, Dye & Harris being filed; Mr. Miles, contra.

Mr. Justice FIELD, after stating the facts of the case, delivered the opinion of the court as follows:

The act of July 17th, 1862,* contemplates the seizure of the property, the forfeiture of which is sought by the proceedings taken under its provisions. It says so in express terms. In one section it makes it the duty of the President "to cause the seizure" of the estate and property, money, stocks...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases