1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 100 U.S.
  5. 100 U.S. 75 (____)
 

ARTHUR v. HEROLD

100 U.S. 75 (____)

ARTHUR v. HEROLD.

Supreme Court of United States.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Assistant Attorney-General Smith for the plaintiff in error.

Mr. Stephen G. Clarke for the defendant in error.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.

We think it was not error for the court to say to the jury that ground chicory was the same thing as burnt chicory. The chicory root cannot be ground until it is burned, and burnt chicory is not an article of commerce until it is ground. Whether or not the article imported was a new preparation, and something other than ground chicory, that is to say, whether it was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases