1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 213 P.3d
  5. 213 P.3d 966 (2009)
 

ABROMATS v. WOOD

Nos. S-08-0195, S-09-0196.

213 P.3d 966 (2009)

2009 WY 100

Letitia C. ABROMATS, Philip E. Abromats, Appellants (Plaintiffs) v. Don WOOD, Brenda Wood, Appellees (Defendants). Don Wood, Brenda Wood, Appellants (Defendants), v. Letitia C. Abromats, Philip E. Abromats, Appellees (Plaintiffs).

Supreme Court of Wyoming.

August 19, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Representing Appellants in S-08-0195 and Appellees in S-08-0196: Philip E. Abromats of Philip E. Abromats, P.C., Greybull, Wyoming.

Representing Appellees in S-08-0195 and Appellants in S-08-0196: Bradley T. Cave of Holland & Hart LLP, Cheyenne, Wyoming, and Hadassah M. Reimer of Holland & Hart LLP, Jackson, Wyoming. Argument by Ms. Reimer.

Before VOIGT, C.J., and GOLDEN, HILL, KITE, and BURKE, JJ.

VOIGT, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Philip and Letitia Abromats request relief from summary judgment granted to Don and Brenda Wood, claiming that the district court erred when it found that one allegedly defamatory statement contained in a victim impact statement was not libel per se and that the other allegedly defamatory statement was protected by qualified immunity as a statement concerning a common interest. The Woods, in their cross appeal, request that this Court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases