John DOE 1, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Petitioners,
John Doe 5 and Jane Doe 5, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
John Doe 6, Jane Doe 6, John Doe 8 and Jane Doe 8, Plaintiffs,
v.
MADISON METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant-Respondent,
Gender Equity Association of James Madison Memorial High School, Gender Sexuality Alliance of Madison West High School and Gender Sexuality Alliance of Robert M. LaFollette High School, Intervenors-Defendants-Respondents.
Supreme Court of Wisconsin.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
For the defendant-respondent and interevenors-defendants-respondents, there was a brief filed by Emily M. Feinstein , Adam R. Prinsen , Sarah A. Zylstra , Sarah J. Horner, and Quarles & Brady LLP, Madison, and Boardman & Clark LLP, Madison. There was an oral argument for the defendant-respondent by Sarah A. Zylstra and an oral argument for the intervenors-defendants-respondents by Adam R. Prinsen .
An amicus curiae brief was filed by Frederick W. Claybrook, Jr. , Matthew M. Fernholz , and Claybrook LLC, Washington, D.C., and Cramer, Multhauf & Hammes, LLP, Waukesha for Wisconsin Family Action, Illinois Family Institute, Minnesota Family Council, Delaware Family Policy Council, Nebraska Family Alliance, Hawaii Family Forum, The Family Foundation, Minnesota-Wisconsin Baptist Convention, Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention, Concerned Women for America, Ethics & Public Policy Center, National Legal Foundation, and Pacific Justice Institute.
An amicus curiae brief was filed by Tamara B. Packard and Pines Bach LLP, Madison, for Madison Teachers Inc.
An amicus curiae brief was filed by Eric G. Pearson , Morgan J. Tilleman , Megan C. Isom , and Foley & Lardner LLP, Milwaukee for the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and the Wisconsin Council of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.
An amicus curiae brief was filed by Daniel R. Suhr and Liberty Justice Center, Chicago, for the Liberty Justice Center.
HAGEDORN, J., delivered the majority opinion of the Court, in which ANN WALSH BRADLEY, DALLET, and KAROFSKY, JJ., joined. ROGGENSACK, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which ZIEGLER, C.J., and REBECCA GRASSL BRADLEY, J., joined.
BRIAN HAGEDORN, J.
¶1 This case involves a constitutional challenge by parents to a school district policy. The substantive issues, however, remain pending before the circuit court and are not properly before us. This is an appeal contesting the circuit court's decision to seal and protect the parents' identities from the public and the school...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
