STATE v. RUFFIN

No. 2019AP1046-CR.

974 N.W.2d 432 (2022)

2022 WI 34

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Theophilous RUFFIN, Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Opinion Filed: May 26, 2022.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff-respondent-petitioner there were briefs filed by Jennifer L. Vandermeuse , assistant attorney general, with whom on the briefs was Joshua L. Kaul , attorney general. There was an oral argument by Jennifer L. Vandermeuse .

For the defendant-appellant there was a brief filed by Nicole M. Masnica and Gimbel, Reilly, Guerin & Brown LLP. There was an oral argument by Nicole M. Masnica .

ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J., delivered the majority opinion for a unanimous Court.


¶1 The petitioner, the State of Wisconsin, seeks review of a decision of the court of appeals that reversed the circuit court in part and remanded for an evidentiary hearing.1 Specifically, the court of appeals determined that Theophilous Ruffin alleged sufficient facts so as to entitle him...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases