No. 2019AP447-CR.

960 N.W.2d 32 (2021)

2021 WI 51

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Heather Jan VANBEEK, Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Opinion Filed: June 4, 2021.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the defendant-appellant, there were briefs filed by Jay Pucek , assistant state public defender. There was an oral argument by Jay Pucek.

For the plaintiff-respondent, there was a brief filed by Scott E. Rosenow , assistant attorney general; with whom on the brief was Joshua L. Kaul , attorney general. There was an oral argument by Scott E. Rosenow.

ROGGENSACK, J., delivered the majority opinion of the Court with respect to ¶¶22-35 and ¶¶46-65, in which ANN WALSH BRADLEY, DALLET, and KAROFSKY, JJ., joined, and an opinion with respect to ¶¶1-21, ¶¶36-45, and ¶66. DALLET, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which ANN WALSH BRADLEY and KAROFSKY, JJ., joined. ZIEGLER, C.J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which REBECCA GRASSL BRADLEY and HAGEDORN, JJ., joined.

¶1 This case is before us on certification from the court of appeals1 pursuant to Wis. Stat. § (Rule) 809.61 (2019-20).2 The court of appeals certified the following question: "whether a consensual encounter becomes an unconstitutional seizure under...

Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases