DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST PARKS

No. 2016AP85-D.

953 N.W.2d 873 (2021)

2021 WI 10

In the MATTER OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST Daniel PARKS, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complaint-Respondent, v. Daniel Parks, Respondent-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Opinion Filed: February 11, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the respondent-appellant, there were briefs filed by Daniel Parks , Peyton B. Engel , and Hurley, Burish & Stanton, S.C., Madison.

For the complainant-respondent, there was a brief filed by Brenda K. Sunby , Wausau.

Per Curiam. HAGEDRON, J., dissents, joined by REBECCA GRASSL BRADLEY, J.


ATTORNEY reinstatement proceeding. Reinstatement denied.

¶1 We review a report filed by Referee John Nicholas Schweitzer, recommending that the court reinstate Attorney Daniel Parks' license to practice law in Wisconsin. After careful review, we disagree with the recommendation and we deny Attorney Parks' reinstatement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases