1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 950 N.W.2d
  5. 950 N.W.2d 877 (2020)
 

HENNESSY v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

Appeal No. 2019AP1206.

950 N.W.2d 877 (2020)

2020 WI App 64

Daniel J. HENNESSY, Jr. and Jane E. Hennessy, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Opinion Filed September 15, 2020.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the plaintiffs-appellants, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Brian G. Cahill , Daniel A. Manna , and Daniel J. Kennedy of Gass Weber Mullins LLC, Milwaukee.

On behalf of the defendant-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of Carla O. Andres , Nina G. Beck , Daniel J. Blinka of Godfrey & Kahn, S.C., Milwaukee.

Before Brash, P.J., Blanchard and Donald, JJ.

¶1 Daniel Hennessy and Jane Hennessy appeal a circuit court order finding that a Mexican court judgment against the Hennessys is valid under Mexican law, and determining that Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., is entitled to domesticate the Mexican judgment in Milwaukee County Circuit Court, giving it effect in Wisconsin under principles...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases