KOSCHKEE v. TAYLOR

No. 2017AP2278-OA.

929 N.W.2d 600 (2019)

2019 WI 76

Kristi KOSCHKEE, Amy Rosno, Christopher Martinson and Mary Carney, Petitioners, v. Carolyn Stanford TAYLOR, in her official capacity as Wisconsin Superintendent of Public Instruction and Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Opinion Filed: June 25, 2019.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the petitioners, there were briefs filed by Richard M. Esenberg , Brian McGrath , CJ Szafir , and Wisconsin Institute For Law & Liberty, Milwaukee. There was an oral argument by Richard M. Esenberg.

For the respondents, there was a brief filed by Ryan Nilsestuen , Benjamin R. Jones , and Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction, Madison. There was an oral argument by Lester A. Pines and Pines Bach LLP, Madison.

An amicus curiae brief was filed on behalf of Wisconsin Association of School Boards, Inc., and the Wisconsin School Administrators' Alliance, Inc., by Michael J. Julka , Richard F. Verstegen , M. Tess O'Brien-Heinzen , and Wisconsin Association of School Boards, Inc. and School Administrators' Alliance, Inc., Madison. There was an oral argument by Richard F. Verstegen.

An amicus curiae brief was filed on behalf of Peggy Coyne , Mary Bell , Mark W. Taylor , Corey Otis , Marie Stangel , Jane Weidner , and Kristin A. Voss , by Lester A. Pines and Pines Bach LLP, Madison. With whom on the brief was Christina M. Ripley and Wisconsin Education Association Council, Madison. There was an oral argument by Jeffrey A. Mandell and Stafford Rosenbaum LLP, Madison.


¶1 This is an original action brought by Kristi Koschkee et al., two licensed teachers and two school board members, against Superintendent of Public Instruction (SPI) Carolyn Stanford Taylor and the Department of Public Instruction (DPI). The petitioners argue that the SPI and DPI must comply with the statutory...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases