1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 922 N.W.2d
  5. 922 N.W.2d 61 (2019)
 

WHITE v. CITY OF WATERTOWN

No. 2016AP2259.

922 N.W.2d 61 (2019)

2019 WI 9

Dr. Stuart WHITE and Janet White, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. CITY OF WATERTOWN, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner, Township of Watertown and Township of Watertown Chairman Richard Gimbler, Defendants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Opinion Filed: January 31, 2019.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the defendant-appellant-petitioner, there were briefs filed by Matthew L. Granitz , Joseph M. Wirth , and Piper, Schmidt & Wirth, Milwaukee. There was an oral argument by Joseph M. Wirth.

For the plaintiffs-respondents, there was a brief filed by Scott B. Rasmussen and Rasmussen Law Offices, Beaver Dam. There was an oral argument by Scott B. Rasmussen.

¶ 1 Some adjoining landowners in the City of Watertown have a long-standing dispute over who must pay to construct and maintain partition fencing between their properties. This case, however, is not about the neighbors' dispute, at least not directly. It is instead about the mechanism by which that dispute is addressed. The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases