STATE v. McKELLIPS

No. 2014AP827-CR.

881 N.W.2d 258 (2016)

2016 WI 51

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Rory A. McKELLIPS, Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided June 28, 2016.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff-respondent-petitioner, the cause was argued by Katherine D. Lloyd , assistant attorney general, with whom on the briefs was Brad D. Schimel , attorney general.

For the defendant-appellant, there was a brief by Scott A. Swid , Benjamin J. Krautkramer , and Swid Law Offices, LLC, Mosinee and oral argument by Scott A. Swid.

There was an amicus curiae brief by Robert R. Henak and Henak Law Office, S.C., Milwaukee, on behalf of Wisconsin Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.


¶ 1 The State appeals the court of appeals published decision1 reversing Rory A. McKellips' conviction after a jury found McKellips guilty of using a computer to facilitate a child sex crime contrary to Wis. Stat. § 948.075(1r) (2013-14).2 The main issue in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases