1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 882 N.W.2d
  5. 882 N.W.2d 371 (2016)
 

PRINCE CORP. v. VANDENBERG

Nos. 2014AP2097, 2014AP2295.

882 N.W.2d 371 (2016)

369 Wis.2d 387

2016 WI 49

PRINCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Respondent, v. James N. VANDENBERG, Defendant, Van De Hey Real Estate, LLC, Garnishee-Defendant-Cross Claimant-Respondent, Sharon Kempen, Sandra Schmit and Mark Vandenberg, Intervenors-Cross-Claim Defendants-Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants-Petitioners, v. BMO Harris Bank (f/k/a M & I Marshall & Isley) and State of Wisconsin, Third-Party Defendants, Wisconsin Department of Revenue, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided June 23, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the intervenors-cross-claim defendants-third-party plaintiffs-appellants-petitioners, there were briefs by George Burnett and the Law Firm of Conway, Olejniczak & Jerry, S.C., Green Bay. Oral argument by George Burnett.

For the third-party defendant-respondent, the cause was argued by S. Michael Murphy , assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Brad D. Schimel , attorney general.

¶ 1 We review a published decision of the court of appeals,2 which affirmed the circuit court's3 order entitling the Department of Revenue (DOR) to garnish land contract proceeds due to James N. Vandenberg (James) and three other tenants-in-common...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases