John DOE 56, John Doe 57, a minor and Parents of John Does 56 and 57, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Petitioners,
v.
MAYO CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM — EAU CLAIRE CLINIC, INC., David A. Van de Loo, M.D., ProAssurance Casualty Co. and Injured Patients and Families Compensation Fund, Defendants-Respondents.
Supreme Court of Wisconsin.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
For the defendants-respondents David A. Van de Loo and ProAssurance Casualty Company, there was a brief by Samuel J. Leib , Brent A. Simerson and Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker, LLP, Milwaukee, and oral argument by Samuel J. Leib.
For the defendant-respondent Injured Patients & Families Compensation Fund, there was a brief by Jeremy T. Gill and Nash, Spindler, Grimstad & McCracken, LLP, Manitowoc.
For the defendants-respondents Mayo Clinic Health System-Eau Claire Clinic, Inc. and ProAssurance Casualty Co., there was a brief by Guy DuBeau , Timothy M. Barber , and Axley Brynelson, LLP, Madison, and oral argument by Guy DuBeau.
REBECCA G. BRADLEY, J.
¶ 1 Minors John Doe 56 and John Doe 57 appeal from the decision of the court of appeals,1 which affirmed the circuit court's2 dismissal of the Does' medical malpractice claims based on the statute of limitations. The issue is whether the statute of limitations...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
