DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST HAMMIS

No. 2012AP818-D.

859 N.W.2d 108 (2015)

2015 WI 14

In the Matter of DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST James E. HAMMIS, Attorney at Law. Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant-Respondent, v. James E. Hammis, Respondent-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided February 17, 2015.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the respondent-appellant, there were briefs by James E. Hammis and Hammis Law Offices, LLC, Stoughton, and oral argument by James E. Hammis.

For the Office of Lawyer Regulation, there was a brief and oral argument by Robert G. Krohn and Roethe Pope Roethe LLP, Edgerton.


¶ 1 Attorney James E. Hammis appeals a report filed by referee James C. Boll Jr. on August 5, 2013, concluding that Attorney Hammis committed nine counts of professional misconduct and recommending that this court suspend his license to practice law in Wisconsin for a period of four months, that Attorney Hammis make restitution to a client...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases