APPLING v. WALKER

No. 2011AP1572.

853 N.W.2d 888 (2014)

2014 WI 96

Julaine K. APPLING, Jo Egelhoff, Jaren E. Hiller, Richard Kessenich and Edmund L. Webster, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Petitioners v. Scott WALKER, Kitty Rhoades and Oskar Anderson, Defendants-Respondents, Fair Wisconsin, Inc., Glenn Carlson, Michael Childers, Crystal Hyslop, Janice Czyscon, Kathy Flores, Ann Kendzierski, David Kopitzke, Paul Klawiter, Chad Wege and Andrew Wege, Intervening Defendants-Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided July 31, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiffs-appellants-petitioners, there were briefs by Michael D. Dean and First Freedoms Foundation Inc., Brookfield; Richard Esenberg , Mequon; David Austin Robert Nimocks , James A. Campbell , and Alliance Defending Freedom, Washington D.C., and oral argument by David Austin Robert Nimocks.

For the intervening defendants-respondents, the cause was argued by Christopher R. Clark of Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc., Chicago; with whom on the brief was Brian Butler , Barbara Neider , and Stafford Rosenbaum LLP, Madison.

An amicus curiae brief was filed by Dyann L. Hafner , assistant corporation counsel, on behalf of Dane County.

An amicus curiae brief was filed by Donald K. Schott , Joseph T. Hanes , and Quarles & Brady LLP, Madison; Sarah L. Fowles and Quarles & Brady LLP, Milwaukee; and Laurence J. Dupuis and ACLU of Wisconsin Foundation, Inc., Milwaukee; and John A. Knight and American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, Chicago; on behalf of LGBT Chamber of Commerce, Katharine Heyning , Judith Trampf , Wendy Woodruff , Mary Woodruff , Jayne Dunnum , Robin Timm , Virgina Wolf, and Carol Schumacher.


N. PATRICK CROOKS, J.

¶ 1 Wisconsin voters amended the state constitution in 2006, adding two sentences: "Only a marriage between one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in this state. A legal status identical or substantially similar to that of marriage for unmarried individuals shall not be valid or recognized in this state."1 In this case we are asked to determine...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases