1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 849 N.W.2d
  5. 849 N.W.2d 798 (2014)
 

STATE v. TATE

No. 2012AP336-CR.

849 N.W.2d 798 (2014)

2014 WI 89

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Bobby L. TATE, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided July 24, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the defendant-appellant-petitioner, there were briefs by Byron Lichstein , law student Michael J. King , and Frank J. Remington Center, University of Wisconsin Law School, and oral argument by Byron Lichstein.

For the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was argued by Jeffrey J. Kassel , assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was J.B. Van Hollen , attorney general.

PATIENCE DRAKE ROGGENSACK, J.

¶ 1 We review an unpublished decision of the court of appeals1 affirming the decision of the Milwaukee County Circuit Court2 denying defendant Bobby L. Tate's motion to suppress evidence that law enforcement obtained by tracking Tate's cell phone using cell site location information ("cell site information") and a stingray. Before tracking Tate's cell phone, law enforcement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases