1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 851 N.W.2d
  5. 851 N.W.2d 235 (2014)
 

STATE v. SARFRAZ

No. 2012AP337-CR.

851 N.W.2d 235 (2014)

2014 WI 78

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Muhammad SARFRAZ, Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided July 22, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff-respondent-petitioner, the cause was argued by Daniel J. O'Brien , assistant attorney general, with whom on the briefs was J.B. Van Hollen , attorney general.

For the defendant-respondent, there was a brief by Jason D. Luczak , Raymond M. Dall'Osto , and Gimbel, Reilly, Guerin & Brown LLP, Milwaukee, and oral argument by Jason D. Luczak .

MICHAEL J. GABLEMAN, J.

¶ 1 The petitioner, State of Wisconsin, seeks review of a published court of appeals decision1 that reversed the circuit court's judgment of conviction against the defendant, Muhammad Sarfraz, and remanded the case for a new trial. The court of appeals determined that the circuit court had erred by denying Sarfraz's motion to admit evidence of a prior sexual relationship...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases