1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 847 N.W.2d
  5. 847 N.W.2d 793 (2014)
 

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THOMPSON

No. 2011AP2458-D.

847 N.W.2d 793 (2014)

353 Wis.2d 556

2014 WI 25

In the Matter of DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST Peter J. THOMPSON, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant-Respondent, v. Peter J. Thompson, Respondent-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided May 20, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the respondent-appellant, there were briefs by Peter J. Thompson, pro se.

For the Office of Lawyer Regulation, there was a brief by Robert G. Krohn and Roethe Pope Roethe LLP, Edgerton.

ATTORNEY disciplinary proceeding. Complaint dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

¶ 1 Attorney Peter J. Thompson, pro se, appeals Referee James Curtis's report concluding that Attorney Thompson engaged in professional misconduct warranting a public reprimand. Under the facts presented, we conclude Attorney Thompson did not violate the rules of professional conduct as alleged in the complaint. However, we remind lawyers to proceed with caution when considering disclosure of confidential client information in response to a claim...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases