1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 844 N.W.2d
  5. 844 N.W.2d 652 (2014)
 

MAYO v. BOYD

No. 2013AP1578.

844 N.W.2d 652 (2014)

2014 WI App 37

Thomas MAYO and James Hayslett, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Jimmy D. BOYD, Defendant-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Opinion Filed February 4, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the plaintiffs-appellants, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Mark L. Thomsen and Sarah F. Kaas of Cannon & Dunphy, S.C., Brookfield.

On behalf of the defendant-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of John J. Glinski , assistant attorney general, and J.B. Van Hollen , attorney general.

Before FINE, KESSLER and BRENNAN, JJ.

BRENNAN, J.

¶ 1 Thomas Mayo and James Hayslett appeal from the circuit court's order dismissing their complaint against Jimmy D. Boyd. The circuit court dismissed the complaint because Mayo and Hayslett purportedly failed to strictly comply with the time-of-the-event requirement set forth in WIS. STAT. § 893.82(3) (2011-12).1 Because we conclude that § 893.82(3) cannot reasonably be read to require a plaintiff to provide...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases