1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 834 N.W.2d
  5. 834 N.W.2d 384 (2013)
 

IN RE RIEK

No. 2011AP1049-D.

834 N.W.2d 384 (2013)

2013 WI 81

In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Sharon A. RIEK, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant-Appellant, v. Sharon A. Riek, Respondent-Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided July 23, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the complainant-appellant, there were briefs by Jonathan E. Hendrix and the Office of Lawyer Regulation, and oral argument by Jonathan E. Hendrix.

For the respondent-respondent, there was a brief by Martin E. Kohler and Geoffrey R. Misfeldt and Kohler and Hart, S.C., Milwaukee, and oral argument by Geoffrey R. Misfeldt.

PER CURIAM.

¶ 1 The Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) appeals a referee's decision recommending the court dismiss a disciplinary complaint alleging that Attorney Sharon A. Riek violated SCR 20:3.8(f)(1) and Wis. Stat. § 971.23(1)(h) (2007-08),1 made actionable via SCR 20:8.4(f). We agree with the referee's conclusion that Attorney Riek did not violate the aforementioned rules. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases