1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 833 N.W.2d
  5. 833 N.W.2d 126 (2013)
 

STATE v. ALEXANDER

No. 2011AP394-CR.

833 N.W.2d 126 (2013)

2013 WI 70

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Demone ALEXANDER, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided July 12, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the defendant-appellant-petitioner, there was a brief by Hans P. Koesser and Koesser Law Office, S.C., Kenosha, with oral argument by Hans P. Koesser.

For the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was argued by Thomas Balistreri , assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was J.B. Van Hollen , attorney general.

MICHAEL J. GABLEMAN, J.

¶ 1 We are asked to determine whether a defendant must be physically present when a judge holds an in-chambers discussion with a juror during the middle of a trial. We recognize that a defendant has a constitutional right to be present at his trial. Kentucky v. Stincer, 482 U.S. 730, 745, 107 S.Ct. 2658, 96 L.Ed.2d 631 (1987). Whether this right to be present...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases