STATE v. LONKOSKI

No. 2010AP2809-CR.

828 N.W.2d 552 (2013)

2013 WI 30

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Matthew A. LONKOSKI, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided April 9, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the defendant-appellant-petitioner, there were briefs by Andrew Hinkel , assistant state public defender, and oral argument by Andrew Hinkel.

For the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was argued by Warren D. Weinstein , assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was J.B. Van Hollen , attorney general.


N. PATRICK CROOKS, J.

1 This is a review of an unpublished decision of the court of appeals that affirmed the judgment of conviction entered by the circuit court for Oneida County, the Honorable Mark Mangerson presiding.1

¶ 2 At issue in this case is the admissibility of statements made to detectives in an interrogation. The threshold question is whether Matthew A. Lonkoski was in police custody for purposes of Miranda...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases