1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 823 N.W.2d
  5. 823 N.W.2d 830 (2012)
 

STATE v. LICHTY

No. 2011AP2873-CR.

823 N.W.2d 830 (2012)

344 Wis.2d 733

2012 WI App 126

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Ronald W. LICHTY, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Opinion Filed October 24, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of John J. Grau of Grau Law Office of Waukesha.

On behalf of the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of Sandra L. Tarver , assistant attorney general, and J.B. Van Hollen , attorney general.

Before BROWN, C.J., NEUBAUER, P.J., and GUNDRUM, J.

BROWN, C.J.

¶ 1 This is a case where the defendant agreed to plead to an offense, with everyone thinking the maximum amount of extended supervision allowable was one thing, but was sentenced based on a lesser maximum when the court learned of the error. We hold that when a good-faith legal error is made at the plea hearing regarding the maximum periods of initial confinement and extended supervision permitted by Wisconsin law, and when that error was corrected...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases