1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 811 N.W.2d
  5. 811 N.W.2d 447 (2012)
 

BORNTREGER v. SMITH

No. 2011AP703.

811 N.W.2d 447 (2012)

2012 WI App 35

Enos BORNTREGER, Plaintiff, v. Maurice SMITH and Gail Smith, Defendants-Appellants, Auto-Owners Insurance, Defendant-Respondent, DragSmith Farms, Inc., Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Opinion Filed February 23, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the defendants-appellants, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Matthew A. Biegert of Doar, Drill & Skow, S.C., New Richmond.

On behalf of the defendant-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of Steven G. Danielson of Danielson Law Offices, LLC, Eau Claire.

Before LUNDSTEN, P.J., VERGERONT and HIGGINBOTHAM, JJ.

LUNDSTEN, P.J.

¶ 1 This appeal concerns a commercial general liability insurance policy that provided coverage for a farm owned by Maurice and Gail Smith. While the policy was in effect, a worker on the Smiths' farm, Enos Borntreger, was injured on the job and sued the Smiths. A dispute arose between the Smiths and their insurer, Auto-Owners. The Smiths and Auto-Owners dispute whether the Auto-Owners' policy provides coverage for the damages sought by Borntreger...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases