MANLICK v. LOPPNOW

No. 2010AP2034.

804 N.W.2d 712 (2011)

2011 WI App 132

Dale MANLICK and Carrie Manlick, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Gilbert LOPPNOW and Gail Loppnow, Defendants-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

August 2, 2011.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the plaintiffs-appellants, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Patricia A. Schober of Schober, Bostetter & Heiden, S.C. of Milwaukee, WI.

On behalf of the defendants-respondents, the cause was submitted on the brief of John M. Bruce and Thomas J. Marola of New Berlin, WI.

Before FINE, KESSLER and BRENNAN, JJ.


BRENNAN, J.

¶ 1 This dispute centers upon the riparian rights of two battling lakefront neighbors, Dale and Carrie Manlick and Gilbert and Gail Loppnow, and where they each have a right to place their respective piers and shore stations. On appeal, the Manlicks argue that the trial court erred in concluding that the coterminous method was the proper method by which to determine the parties' riparian rights. Instead, the Manlicks contend that the question of which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases