1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 793 N.W.2d
  5. 793 N.W.2d 884 (2011)
 

IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST HAMMIS

No. 2009AP468-D.

793 N.W.2d 884 (2011)

2011 WI 3

In the Matter of DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST James E. HAMMIS, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant-Respondent-Cross-Appellant, v. James E. Hammis, Respondent-Appellant-Cross-Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided January 20, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the complainant-respondent-cross-appellant there were briefs by Robert G. Krohn and Roethe Pope Roethe LLP, Edgerton, and oral argument by Robert G. Krohn .

For the respondent-appellant-cross-respondent there were briefs by Lester A. Pines and Cullen Weston Pines & Bach LLP, Madison, and oral argument by Lester A. Pines .

PER CURIAM.

¶ 1 Attorney James E. Hammis appeals a report filed by Referee Lisa Goldman on January 7, 2010, concluding that Attorney Hammis committed 10 of 13 alleged counts of professional misconduct, recommending this court suspend him for a period of four months, and recommending imposition of costs. Attorney Hammis does not appeal the referee's findings or conclusions of law but seeks a shorter suspension. The Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) cross-appeals...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases