CARGILL FEED DIV./CARGILL MALT v. LIRC

No. 2009AP1877.

789 N.W.2d 326 (2010)

2010 WI App 115

CARGILL FEED DIVISION/CARGILL MALT AND AIG CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LABOR AND INDUSTRY REVIEW COMMISSION and Charles Renz, Defendants-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Opinion Filed July 29, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the plaintiffs-appellants, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Joseph P. Danas, Jr. , and Patryk Silver of Borgelt, Powell, Peterson & Frauen, S.C., Milwaukee.

On behalf of the defendant-respondent LIRC, the cause was submitted on the brief of David A. Hart , assistant attorney general, and J.B. Van Hollen , attorney general.

On behalf of the defendant-respondent Charles Renz, the cause was submitted on the brief of Charles M. Soule of Stafford & Neal, S.C., Madison.

Before DYKMAN, P.J., LUNDSTEN and HIGGINBOTHAM, JJ.


HIGGINBOTHAM, J.

¶ 1 This case involves a worker's compensation claim, and the Labor and Industry Review Commission's determination that the injured worker, Charles Renz, a former employee of Cargill Feed Division/Cargill Malt, is permanently and totally disabled under the so-called "odd-lot" doctrine. "The odd-lot doctrine is a judge-made adjunct to the law of worker's compensation." Beecher v. LIRC, 2004 WI 88, ¶ 2, 273 Wis.2d...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases