STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Phillip Brian CONAWAY, Defendant-Respondent.
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Craig Griffin, Defendant-Respondent.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Submitted on Briefs August 10, 2009.
Opinion Filed December 23, 2009.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
On behalf of the plaintiff-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Eileen W. Pray, assistant attorney general, and J.B. Van Hollen, attorney general.
On behalf of the defendant-respondent Phillip Brian Conaway, the cause was submitted on the brief of Philip J. Brehm of Janesville.
On behalf of the defendant-respondent Craig Griffin, the cause was submitted on the brief of Michael Shannon Murphy, The Law Office of Michael Shannon Murphy, Janesville.
Before DYKMAN, P.J., VERGERONT and LUNDSTEN, JJ.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
¶ 1 LUNDSTEN, J.
A police officer stopped a car because of a suspected window tint violation. The stop resulted in the discovery of heroin and drug paraphernalia. The occupants of the car, Phillip Conaway and Craig Griffin, moved to suppress the drug evidence, asserting that the stop was not supported by reasonable suspicion that the rear window failed to meet the applicable light-pass-through standard in the administrative...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
