1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 775 N.W.2d
  5. 775 N.W.2d 270 (2009)
 

MAYPARK v. SECURITAS SEC. SERVICES USA

No. 2008AP1528.

775 N.W.2d 270 (2009)

2009 WI App 145

Lori L. MAYPARK, Mary Pat Geddes and Marcia Lynn See, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC., Defendant-Appellant, Troy C. Schmidt and Polaris Industries, Inc., Defendants. Lisa Christenson, Shannon Aubart, Amelia Cran, Tina M. Dixon, Julie J. Gross, Brenda Johnston and Tami L. Majewski, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc., Defendant-Appellant, Troy C. Schmidt, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Opinion Filed September 1, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Beth Ermatinger Hanan of Gass Weber Mullins, LLC, of Milwaukee; Susan G. Schellinger and Heather K. Gatewood of Davis & Kuelthau, S.C. of Milwaukee; James R. Johnson of Lommen, Abdo, Cole, King & Stageberg, P.A. of Hudson.

On behalf of the plaintiff-respondent, Mary Pat Geddes, the cause was submitted on the brief of Warren Lee Brandt of Brandt Law Office, S.C. of Prescott.

On behalf of the plaintiffs-respondents, Lisa Christenson, Shannon Aubart, Amelia Cran, Tina M. Dixon, Julie J. Gross, Brenda Johnston and Tami L. Majewski, the cause was submitted on the brief of Matthew A. Biegert of Doar, Drill & Skow, S.C. of New Richmond.

On behalf of the plaintiffs-respondents, Lori L. Maypark and Marcia Lynn See, the cause was submitted on the brief of Carol S. Dittmar of Carol Dittmar Law Office, LLC, of Chippewa Falls.

Before HOOVER, P.J., and PETERSON and BRUNNER, JJ.

¶ 1 HOOVER, P.J.

Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. appeals judgments awarding money damages for severe emotional distress caused by its negligent training and supervision of its employee, Troy Schmidt. Securitas argues it was not negligent because it was not foreseeable that allowing its employees to access the internet would create an unreasonable risk of harm to others. Securitas also contends public policy considerations preclude liability even if it was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases