1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 772 N.W.2d
  5. 772 N.W.2d 677 (2009)
 

XEROX CORP. v. WISCONSIN DEPT. OF REVENUE

No. 2007AP2884.

772 N.W.2d 677 (2009)

2009 WI App 113

XEROX CORPORATION, Petitioner-Appellant v. WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Respondent-Respondent, City of Milwaukee and City of La Crosse, Intervenors-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Opinion Filed July 30, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the petitioner-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Maureen A. McGinnity of Foley & Lardner LLP, Milwaukee, for Appellant.

On behalf of the respondent-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of F. Thomas Creeron III, assistant attorney general, and J.B. Van Hollen, attorney general, for Respondent.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, P.J., VERGERONT and CURRY, JJ.

¶ 1 HIGGINBOTHAM, P.J.

This is a personal property tax case. The issue is whether certain Xerox Corporation multifunction copier/printer/scanner/fax devices (MFDs) leased to consumers by Xerox are exempt from personal property taxes under WIS. STAT. § 70.11(39) (2007-08).2 The Tax Appeals Commission concluded that the MFDs were nonexempt under the statute, and the circuit court agreed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases