CITY OF SEATTLE v. 2009 CADILLAC CTS

No. 76435-7-I.

409 P.3d 1121 (2017)

The CITY OF SEATTLE, a municipal corporation, and the Seattle Police Department, Respondents, v. 2009 CADILLAC CTS, WA License ASU1242 and $1,741.86 in U.S. Currency, and Four Tires and Four Rims, Defendants In Rem, Johnny White, Claimant, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

Publication Ordered January 26, 2018.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Aaron A. Pelley , 7 Point Law PLLC, 119 1st Ave. S Ste. 420, Seattle, WA, 98104-3984 for Appellant.

Heidi Maria Sargent , Michael K. Ryan , Seattle City Attorney's Office, 701 5th Ave. Ste. 2050, Seattle, WA, 98104-7095 for Respondents.


PUBLISHED OPINION

¶ 1 Johnny White seeks return of property seized under RCW 69.50.505, arguing the forfeiture hearing was untimely. Our Supreme Court construes the forfeiture statute to require a hearing within 90 days. The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) governs forfeiture hearings.1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases