Certification from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington in Kenneth WRIGHT, on his own behalf and on behalf of other similarly situated persons, Plaintiff,
v.
LYFT, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendants.
Supreme Court of Washington.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Robert M. McKenna , Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Adam Nolan Tabor , Attorney at Law, 701 5th Ave. Ste. 5600, Seattle, WA, 98104-7045, for Amicus Curiae on behalf of Chamber of Commerce of the United States
Amy Chia-Chi Teng , Washington Attorney General's Office, 800 Fifth Ave. Ste. 2000, Seattle, WA, 98104-3188, for Amicus Curiae on behalf of Attorney General of Washington
González, J.
¶ 1 Kenneth Wright received an unsolicited text message that appeared to come from an acquaintance inviting him to download Lyft's cell phone application. Wright sued as a putative class member. The federal district court has asked this court to answer two certified questions relating to the state "Consumer Electronic Mail...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.