1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 385 P.3d
  5. 385 P.3d 156 (2016)
 

CANFIELD v. CLARK

No. 72869-5-I.

385 P.3d 156 (2016)

196 Wash.App. 191

Donald CANFIELD, Appellant, v. Michelle CLARK, Respondent, "John Doe1" and "Jane Doe1," and their marital community, and "John Doe2" and "Jane Doe2," and their marital community, Defendants.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

Publication Ordered October 17, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Chellie Hammack , CM Hammack Law Firm, 801 2nd Ave., Ste. 1410, Seattle, WA, 98104-1517, for Appellant.

Mark F. O'Donnell , Amber Rae Gundlach , Amber Rae Hazelquist , Preg O'Donnell & Gillett, PLLC, 901 5th Ave., Ste. 3400, Seattle, WA, 98164-2026, for Respondent.

¶1 The verdict form used in this defamation case did not hinder the plaintiff's presentation of his theory of defamation per se. The trial court did not err in refusing to order a new trial when the jury returned a verdict of zero damages. We affirm.

¶2 This is appellant Donald Canfield's second appeal. As the result...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases