SLACK v. LUKE

No. 32921-6-III.

370 P.3d 49 (2016)

192 Wash.App. 909

Tammy Wolf SLACK, Appellant, v. Lucinda LUKE, Attorney at Law & Cowan Moore Stam Luke & Peterson, Law Firm, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3.

March 10, 2016.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Howard Mark Goodfriend , Ian Christopher Cairns , Smith Goodfriend PS, Seattle, WA, Raphael Igwens Nwokike , Law Offices of Raphael Nwokike PS, Federal Way, WA, for Appellant.

Stephen Christopher Smith , Hawley Troxell Ennis & Hawley LLP, Boise, ID, Philip Albert Talmadge , Talmadge/Fitzpatrick/Tribe, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.


¶ 1 The trial court dismissed this legal malpractice action at summary judgment because the plaintiff, Tammy Wolf Slack, did not have an attorney expert to testify that her underlying claim had some merit. Although we disagree with that rationale, we nonetheless conclude that because the underlying legal action would not have survived...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases