IN RE WELFARE OF B.P.

No. 32437-1-III.

353 P.3d 224 (2015)

188 Wn. App. 113

In re the WELFARE OF B.P. (DOB: 7/8/11).

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3.

June 4, 2015.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kristina M. Nichols , Nichols Law Firm, PLLC, Spokane, WA, for Appellant.

Amy Suzanne Soth , Attorney General's Office, Spokane, WA, for Respondent.


¶ 1 H.O. appeals the termination of her parental rights over B.P. H.O. contends substantial evidence does not support the court's findings that (1) all necessary services were expressly and understandably offered or provided her, (2) little likelihood existed to remedy conditions so B.P. could be returned to her in the near future...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases