1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 334 P.3d
  5. 334 P.3d 1100 (2014)
 

CASHMERE VALLEY BANK v. STATE, DEPT. OF REV

No. 89367-5.

334 P.3d 1100 (2014)

CASHMERE VALLEY BANK, Petitioner, v. STATE of Washington, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

September 25, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George Carl Mastrodonato , Michael Barr King , Carney Badley Spellman PS, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.

Heidi A. Irvin , Atty Generals Office/Revenue Div, Charles E. Zalesky , Attorney General of Washington, Dept of Revenue A.G. Office, Attorney at Law, Olympia, WA, for Respondent.

Dirk Jay Giseburt , Michele G. Radosevich , Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, Seattle, WA, for Amicus Curiae on behalf of Washington Bankers Association.

WIGGINS, J.

¶ 1 This case turns on interpretation of a state tax deduction statute. Former RCW 82.04.4292 (1980) provided that in computing their business and occupation (B & O) tax, banks and financial institutions could deduct from their income "amounts derived from interest received on investments or loans primarily secured by first mortgages or trust deeds on nontransient residential properties."1 Between 2004 and 2007, Cashmere...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases