HARRIS v. FORTIN

No. 71649-2-I.

333 P.3d 556 (2014)

Corey HARRIS and Juline Harris, Appellants, v. Michael FORTIN, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

September 8, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Scott St. Clair Anders , Russell D. Garrett , Jordan Ramis, PC, Vancouver, WA, for Appellant.

Stephen Garrett Leatham , Heurlin Potter Jahn Leatham & Holtmann, Vancouver, WA, for Respondent.


TRICKEY, J.

¶ 1 The doctrine of judicial estoppel prevents a party from asserting a particular position in a judicial proceeding and later taking a clearly inconsistent position in order to gain an advantage. Here, throughout their bankruptcy proceedings, appellants maintained that a promissory note, on which respondent agreed to pay them a principal amount of $400,000.00, had no value and was uncollectable. Less than a year later, appellants sued respondent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases