1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 316 P.3d
  5. 316 P.3d 999 (2013)
 

BUECKING v. BUECKING

No. 87680-1.

316 P.3d 999 (2013)

179 Wn.2d 438

In the Matter of the Marriage of Amy BUECKING, Respondent, v. Tim BUECKING, Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

December 26, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David G. Porter , Attorney at Law, Bellingham, WA, for Petitioner.

Philip James Buri , Buri Funston Mumford PLLC, Bellingham, WA, for Respondent.

MADSEN, C.J.

¶ 1 Amy Westman1 filed for legal separation from Tim Buecking. Over a year later, she filed an amended petition for dissolution of marriage. By statute, a court cannot enter a decree of dissolution of marriage until 90 days after the petition is filed. Here, the decree was entered 8 days too soon. Mr. Buecking appealed, raising for the first time on appeal his claim that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases